Short-term prone positioning for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome afte

Jian-Hua Yang, Shu Wang, Yuan-Xiu Gan, Xuan-Yun Feng, Bai-Lin Niu

Jian-Hua Yang, Shu Wang, Bai-Lin Niu, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Emergency Medicine, Chongqing 400016, China

Yuan-Xiu Gan, Xuan-Yun Feng, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing 400016, China

Abstract BACKGROUND Aortic dissection is a complex and dangerous cardiovascular disease, with many complications in the perioperative period, including severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which affects prognosis and increases mortality. Despite the effect of prone positioning (PP) in improving oxygenation in patients with severe ARDS, reports about PP early after cardiac surgery are few and such an opt-ion may be an issue in cardiac surgery patients because of the recent sternotomy.CASE SUMMARY A 40-year-old male patient diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection on October 22, 2021 underwent ascending artery replacement plus total aortic arch replacement plus stent elephant trunk implantation under cardiopulmonary bypass. Unfortunately, he developed ARDS on postoperative day 1. Despite comprehensive treatment with aggressive pulmonary protective ventilation, fluid management with continuous renal replacement therapy, the condition continued to deteriorate and rapidly progressed to severe ARDS with a minimum oxygenation index of 51. We are ready to implement salvage therapy, including PP and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Due to the large amount of pericardial mediastinal and thoracic drainage after thoracotomy, ECMO may result in massive postoperative bleeding. Prolonged prone ventilation is often inappropriate after thoracotomy. Therefore, we chose short-term PP for < 6 h. Finally, the oxygenation index greatly improved and the diffuse exudation in both lungs of the patient was significantly reduced with short-term prone positioning.CONCLUSION Intermittent short-term PP can improve early postoperative severe ARDS after acute aortic dissection.

Key Words: Aortic dissection; Short-term prone positioning; Acute respiratory distress syndrome;Oxygenation index; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Case report

INTRODUCTION

Aortic dissection is a complex and dangerous cardiovascular disease, with a high mortality rate, and surgical treatment is an effective way to save life[1-3]. Aortic dissection surgery is traumatic, requiring a long treatment time and deep hypothermia for circulatory arrest[1,2]. A large number of blood transfusions are often required, as well as ischemia-reperfusion due to extracorporeal circulation, so there are many postoperative complications, among which, the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is high, especially in obese patients with acute renal impairment before surgery[1,2,4,5]. ARDS significantly increases postoperative mortality and prolongs ventilator use and intensive care unit (ICU) stay[3]. According to the Berlin definition, ARDS is characterized by acute onset with bilateral lung opacities not explained by cardiac failure and/or fluid overload (Table 1). Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and prone positioning (PP) are important parts in the comprehensive treatment plan of severe ARDS[6-10], ECMO can easily cause fatal bleeding in the case of abnormal coagulation. Standardized and timely PP can effectively improve oxygenation and respiratory mechanics, including increasing functional residual volume, reducing lung shunt, promoting pulmonary secretion discharge, and improving ventilation flow ratio[8,11-13], so as to reduce mortality rate[14]. Guet al[15] used PP to treat severe hypoxemia after aortic dissection and achieved good results. Here, we report a case of successful improvement in oxygenation with postoperative severe ARDS with acute type A aortic dissection treated with PP.

Table 1 Berlin definition and management of acute respiratory distress syndrome

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 40-year-old middle-aged man was admitted to hospital with sudden chest and back pain for 5 h.

History of present illness

The patient suddenly developed severe chest and back pain 5 h ago. The tearing-like pain continued without relief. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the thoracic and abdominal aorta was performed in a large class III general hospital in Chongqing. The examination showed acute type A aortic dissection.

History of past illness

The patient did not have any other medical history other than hypertension.

Personal and family history

The patient had a 20-year history of heavy smoking, two packs per day, with no specific family history.

Physical examination

Physical examination revealed persistent tearing pain in the chest and back.

Laboratory examinations

Renal function test showed that creatinine rose to 237.6 mmol/L.

Imaging examinations

Thoracic and abdominal aorta CTA (Figure 1) showed aortic false lumen formation.

Figure 1 Enhanced computed tomography scan of the patient's aorta. A: Transverse computed tomography (CT) scan of the ascending aorta; B:Cross-sectional CT images of aortic arch; C: Sagittal CT scan of the aorta. The green arrows indicate the aortic dissection.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

(1) Acute aortic dissection (Standford type A); (2) acute kidney injury (AKI) grade II; (3) coagulation dysfunction; (4) acute myocardial injury; (5) hypoproteinemia; and (6) high-risk stage 3 hypertension.

TREATMENT

After preoperative examination, the patient underwent ascending aortic and total aortic arch replacement plus stented elephant trunk implantation under general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass. He was transferred to the ICU in critical condition for continued treatment after surgery. During the operation and on the day of admission to ICU, 4 U of red blood cells, 850 mL of plasma, 20 U of cryoprecipitate, and 2 U of platelets were transfused.

Despite combined treatment with lung protective ventilation, fluid management with continuous renal replacement therapy, and airway secretion clearance, the disease continued to deteriorate and rapidly progressed to severe ARDS. The oxygenation index (OI) dropped from normal to a minimum of 51. We were ready to give emergency rescue measures, including prone ventilation and ECMO, and immediately assessed the feasibility of both approaches. Due to the large amount of drainage from the mediastinal pericardium and chest cavity after thoracotomy, we ruled out ECMO because of the potential risk of massive bleeding. The patient was treated with PP. Prior to treatment, bedside chest radiography was used to assess the lung condition (Figure 2A). The treatment guidelines suggested that PP time should be ≥ 12 h[6]. Although PP has a positive effect on patients with severe ARDS, it may be difficult in cardiac surgery patients because of the recent sternotomy. Because of the patient’s obesity and large amount of mediastinal pericardial and thoracic drainage fluid after thoracotomy, prolonged PP could have increased the risk of drainage tube compression, resulting in poor drainage. Finally, we chose PP for no more than 6 h, and 12 h after the end of PP, the prone position ventilation treatment was performed again. During this period of treatment, we assessed drain patency every hour and monitored circulatory changes in real time to prevent inadequate drainage leading to fatal acute cardiac tamponade. We dynamically followed-up the patient by blood gas analysis. After 4 d of PP, chest X-ray showed that the diffuse exudation from both lungs was significantly reduced (Figure 2B). OI was significantly improved and showed an overall upward trend during PP (Figure 3).

Figure 2 Bedside X-ray images of the patient before and after prone position ventilation. A: X-ray image before prone position ventilation: Diffuse exudation of both lungs; B: X-ray image after three of intermittent prone position ventilation.

Figure 3 Improvement of oxygenation index with prone position ventilation. PaO2: Partial pressure of arterial oxygen; FIO2: Fraction of inspired oxygen; OI: Oxygenation index.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

After intermittent short-term PP, the OI improved greatly and the diffuse exudation in both lungs of the patient was significantly reduced.

DISCUSSION

Surgery is the main treatment for type A aortic dissection[2,16]. Several medical centers have reported that severe hypoxemia is likely to occur after thoracotomy under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)[17], especially in the patients with long-term smoking, obesity, early renal damage and prolonged CPB.

Severe hypoxemia rapidly progresses to severe ARDS, with high mortality[4,18-21]. A study from LUNG SAFE (Large observational study to Understand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory Failure) showed a mortality as high as 46% for severe forms of ARDS[22]. ARDS can have pulmonary (pneumonia, aspiration, pulmonary contusion, pulmonary embolism,etc.) or extrapulmonary (sepsis, acute severe pancreatitis, cardiopulmonary bypass, severe trauma, burns,etc.) causes[5,22-24], and the prominent clinical feature is hypoxemia. It is believed that ischemia–reperfusion injury and the release of large amounts of inflammatory mediators and circulatory arrest during CPB are responsible for ARDS after cardiac surgery[17,20].

Globally, ARDS accounts for 10% of ICU admissions[25]. Although the pathogenesis of ARDS is gradually being revealed and therapeutic approaches have made significant progress, its morbidity and mortality are still high[7,26]. PP has been proven to effectively improve the prognosis of ARDS patients and reduces ventilator-induced lung injury[14,27]. In addition, PP can shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay. When lung protective mechanical ventilation cannot prevent hypoxia or hypercapnia, ECMO may also be considered in patient with severe ARDS[9]. However, even with ECMO support, the mortality rate for severe ARDS is still high. The EOLIA trial showed that in very severe ARDS, the mortality rate was 35% in patients treated with ECMO compared to 46% in patients without ECMO support[28]. Konoet al[29] reported a case that they chose V-V ECMO for Severe Respiratory Failure after Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery. Although PP and ECMO are both options for severe ARDS, ECMO is often not available in general healthcare centers and can easily cause fatal bleeding in patients with abnormal coagulation function. Therefore, PP may be a reliable treatment when ECMO is not an option. Although there are indications and contraindications for the implementation of PP in clinical settings (Table 2), ARDS patients can eventually obtain better therapeutic effect from PP as long as individualized treatment is carried out[30,31]. Guet al[15] found that PP is a safe and feasible option for severe hypoxemia patients after acute type A aortic dissection surgery. The etiology of severe ARDS after cardiac surgery is different from that caused by severe lung infection. Prolonged prone ventilation is often inappropriate after thoracotomy. Therefore, we chose to perform PP for no longer than 12 h, as recommended by Griffithset al[6]. On the premise of ensuring the stability of the thoracic structure and the patency of the pericardial mediastinal drainage tube after thoracotomy, we chose PP for < 6 h at a time, and continued prone position ventilation treatment after 12 h in the supine position, and achieved a good therapeutic effect.

Table 2 Criteria and recommendations for prone ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Therefore, we believe that it is feasible to perform prone ventilation in the early postoperative period in patients with aortic dissection. However, it is necessary to formulate an individualized plan, which not only achieves a better therapeutic effect, but also minimizes the associated potential risks, such as acute cardiac tamponade due to poor drainage of the diaphragmatic drainage tube.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of ARDS after aortic dissection is high, and simple lung protective ventilation and fine fluid management are often ineffective. For patients with severe ARDS after CPB for aortic dissection, intermittent short-course PP may be useful when there is no ECMO support or when the risk associated with ECMO is high.

FOOTNOTES

Author contributions:Niu BL contributed to the study conception and design; Yang JH, Gan YX, Feng XY and Wang S contributed to the data collection and analysis; Yang JH wrote the manuscript; Niu BL and Wang S revised the manuscript; All authors have read the manuscript and approved the final version to be published; Yang JH and Wang S contributed equally to this work.

Supported bythe Chongqing Medical Scientific Research Project (Joint Project of Chongqing Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau), No. 2020FYYX163; Chongqing Medical Key Discipline Construction Project, No. ZDXK202103; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Advanced Middle-Aged and Young Medical Talents Project in Chongqing, No. 2022CDJYGRH-014.

Informed consent statement:Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s family for publication of the patient's medical imaging and related test results.

Conflict-of-interest statement:All the authors declare no competing interests.

CARE Checklist (2016) statement:The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).

Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Country/Territory of origin:China

ORCID number:Jian-Hua Yang 0000-0002-0583-4974; Bai-Lin Niu 0000-0001-9582-7884.

S-Editor:Liu JH

L-Editor:A

P-Editor:Liu JH