时间:2024-12-24
Alexandru Scafa-Udriste, Nicoleta-Monica Popa-Fotea, Vlad Bataila, Lucian Calmac, Maria Dorobantu
Alexandru Scafa-Udriste, Nicoleta-Monica Popa-Fotea, Maria Dorobantu, Department of Cardio-Thoracic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania
Alexandru Scafa-Udriste, Nicoleta-Monica Popa-Fotea, Vlad Bataila, Lucian Calmac, Maria Dorobantu, Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest 014461,Romania
Abstract BACKGROUND Atherosclerosis represents the main cause of myocardial infarction (MI); other causes such as coronary embolism, vasospasm, coronary-dissection or drug use are much rarely encountered, but should be considered in less common clinical scenarios. In young individuals without cardiovascular risk factors, the identification of the cause of MI can sometimes be found in the medical history and previous treatments undertaken.CASE SUMMARY We present the case of a 34-year-old man presenting acute inferior ST-elevation MI without classic cardiac risk factors. Seven years ago, he suffered from orchidopexy for bilateral cryptorchidism, and was recently diagnosed with right testicular seminoma for which he had to undergo surgical resection and chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin. Shortly after the first chemotherapy treatment, namely on day five, he suffered an acute MI.Angiography revealed a mild stenotic lesion at the level of the right coronary artery with suprajacent thrombus and vasospasm, with no other significant lesions on the other coronary arteries. A conservative treatment was decided upon by the cardiac team, including dual antiplatelets therapy and anticoagulants with good further evolution. The patient continued the chemotherapy treatment according to the initial plan without other cardiovascular events.CONCLUSION In young individuals with no cardiovascular risk factors undergoing aggressive chemotherapy, an acute MI can be caused by vascular toxicity of several anticancer drugs.
Key Words: Testicular seminoma; Myocardial infarction; Non-atherosclerotic causes of myocardial infarction; Chemotherapy; Case report
Testicular cancer is a prototypic type of tumor in young men, being at the same time the most frequent solid tumor in the age range of 15 to 40[1]. Despite the negative clinical features and psychological impact[2], the curability rate of testicular cancer with modern therapy is high, with a low mortality at 5- and 10-years[1]. Side effects among testicular cancer survivors are significant, and result from underlying neoplasia and treatment[3].
By all histological subtypes of testicular tumors, seminomas are most frequently encountered in patients with a history of cryptorchidism. In subjects presenting stage I or II seminoma, chemotherapy with cisplatin-based cures assures roughly a 90% rate of curability[4]. Although efficient, the combination of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) is associated with many side effects that include nephrotoxicity,neuropathy, infertility, vascular toxicity or secondary leukemia[5].
Vascular toxicity can take various forms including the Raynaud phenomenon,myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular events. Even if a study showed no supplementary risk of acute vascular events in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy for testicular cancer[6], we present the case of a 34-year-old man who developed inferior MI during the first course of chemotherapy for testicular seminoma. The patient gave informed consent for the presentation of the clinical case.
A 34-year-old man was admitted to the cardiology department for intense chest pain,malaise and diaphoresis. This is the first chest pain episode, the patient describing it as constrictive and not responding to anti-inflammatory medication taken at home.
The chest pain developed 2 h previously, approximately 12 h after he ended his first course of chemotherapy for right testicular seminoma.
Seven years prior, the patient suffered from orchidopexy for bilateral cryptorchidism and had been diagnosed with right testicular seminoma two months prior to the incident under review; surgical resection was performed shortly after the diagnosis and was followed by chemotherapy. The latter was a combination of three anticancer drugs (BEP): Bleomycin 30 mg on days 1-5, 8 and 15, and etoposide 100 mg/mp and cisplatin 20 mg/mp in the first five days. The chemotherapy course would have been repeated on day 21.
On day 5, shortly after the first chemotherapy session, the patient developed severe acute chest pain, 10 out of 10 on the visual analogue scale.
He had neither cardiovascular risk factors, nor a family history of cardiovascular events.
The clinical examination on admission pinpointed, blood pressure of 120/80 mmHg, a heart rate of 85 beats/min, with cardiac and pulmonary examination showing no significant pathological findings.
The electrocardiogram revealed sinus rhythm, ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads (Figure 1) and elevated markers of necrosis (troponin I 8.37 ng/mL, CK-MB 18.23 ng/mL). Total white blood cell count and neutrophil count were within normal ranges.
Total, low-density and high-density lipoproteins cholesterol, as well as glycated haemoglobin were within the normal cut-off values.
The subject’s echocardiography showed hypokinesia in the basal segments of the inferior and infero-lateral walls of the left ventricle, with a global ejection fraction 55%.Furthermore, no significant valvular abnormalities were detected.
The patient was given loading dosages of aspirin and clopidogrel and was directly taken to the catheter laboratory for an angiography, with the final diagnosis of acute inferior ST-elevation MI.
The left main, anterior interventricular and circumflex artery were normal, while the right coronary artery showed a mild stenotic lesion (30%-40%) with slightly suprajacent thrombus and vasospasm (Figure 2).
Medical treatment and follow-up were decided in the catheter laboratory. The patient was admitted to the coronary care unit for 3 d, where he was treated with aspirin,clopidogrel, a calcium blocker (namely verapamil), atorvastatin, isosorbide dinitrate,un-fractioned heparin and perindopril. He remained asymptomatic and was discharged with the same treatment except anticoagulants, in order to continue the chemotherapy according to the initial protocol.
The patient proceeded with chemotherapy without other acute cardiovascular events.At six months later he was asymptomatic from a cardiovascular point of view, with no evidence of active disease found during an abdominopelvic computer tomography. He remained under long-term surveillance for both distant and nodal relapse.
Figure 1 Electrocardiogram with sinus rhythm and ST-segment elevation in DII, DIII and aVF leads.
Figure 2 Right coronary artery showing mild stenotic lesion with thrombus at crux cordis (arrow).
In a patient without cardiovascular risk factors, the emergence of an acute MI shortly after the first course of BEP makes chemotherapy a very likely cause of the acute ischemic event, although the exact pathophysiological mechanisms are difficult to prove conclusively. The patient was in sinus rhythm, and echocardiography ruled out intra-cardiac sources of thrombo-embolism such as intra-cardiac thrombus or tumor,mitral stenosis or other risk factors for embolism, excluding a thromboembolismrelated MI. Furthermore, emboli frequently stop at the level of stenosis, bifurcation or tortuosity, this not being the case of the thrombus identified in our patient that, with a high probability, was formedin situ; moreover, an atherosclerotic cause of this acute MI is less likely, as the other coronary segments showed no signs of atherosclerosis.Although rare and unpredictable, Takotsubo syndrome is associated with several chemotherapy regimens (mainly with 5-fluorouracil), reason for which we had considered this diagnosis. However, the patient did not meet the Mayo clinic criteria[7], since he did not have dyskinesia of left mid-ventricular segment with or without apical involvement as the Mayo clinic criteria requires for such a diagnosis (Video 1, Video 2, and Video 3). Furthermore, the chemotherapy undertaken by our patient is not associated with Takotsubo syndrome, but given the unpredictability of the disease this possibility should be considered even if not reported previously.Consequently, we speculate the patient suffered an endothelial lesion within situthrombus formation promoted by the anticancer drugs with suprajacent coronary vasospam, but in the absence of optical coherence tomography or intravascular echocardiography the exact mechanism cannot be established. For the evaluation of coronary vasospasm, the right coronary artery was injected with 200 μg nitroglycerine with the slight improvement of the acute myocardial infarction culprit lesion, but without its total disappearance. The most likely explanation for the reduced response to nitroglycerine is that the lesion encountered on angiography is the result of a complex mechanism that also includes endothelial erosion apart from coronary vasoconstriction. The erosion of the endothelial taken as one main mechanism of cisplatin vascular toxicity is supported by both experimental and clinical data regarding endothelial damage, apoptosis as well as platelet adherence, activation and aggregation[8,9]. Moreover, an increasing body of evidence points to the fact that cisplatin also induces endothelial dysfunction, affecting both the relaxation and contractile function through severe damage to blood vessel walls[10]. The mechanisms underlying the latter are mainly the reduction of endothelial nitric oxide synthetase and an increase in plasminogen activator inhibitor 1[11], but also include other mechanisms such as hydrogen sulphide availability[12]. Thrombus formation is the result of one or more of the following factors that build Virchow’s triad: endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulation and blood stagnation. All anticancer drugs our patient took can induce either one or more of the factors within Virchow’s triad. Bleomycin increases interleukin-1 secretion at the pulmonary level, and further on the latter acts on the vascular endothelial promoting procoagulant activity and leukocyte adhesion[13]. Other studies have shown that cisplatin induces coronary spasms[14]and even direct damage to vascular endothelium[8]. Moreover, etoposide is associated with the increased risk of MI[15] especially if used in conjunction with other cardiotoxic agents. Another mechanism of thrombosis which could have explained the broader angiographic picture is a prolonged vasospasm with coronary occlusion and secondary thrombus formation[16].
For the case presented above we hypothesize that the particular chemotherapy regimen employed induced not only an endothelial dysfunction with vasospasm, but also a direct endothelial lesion that promoted thrombus formation in a subject predisposed to thrombosis given the neoplasia and anticancer treatment. Procoagulant activity increases mainly when multiple drugs work synergistically in combination, as in the case of our patient[6]. Furthermore, many factors contribute to the systemic overall cardiotoxicity, some related to the drugs themselves but also to the individual.Moreover, given that young individuals without any cardiovascular risk factors are predisposed to ischemic cardiovascular events, preventive measures during chemotherapy should actively be implemented; for example, one such measure could be the addition of anticoagulants or aspirin[17] to the adjuvant therapy, along with the reduction in dosages, the increase of time-intervals between treatment administration and the avoidance of certain combinations of anti-cancer drugs.
我们致力于保护作者版权,注重分享,被刊用文章因无法核实真实出处,未能及时与作者取得联系,或有版权异议的,请联系管理员,我们会立即处理! 部分文章是来自各大过期杂志,内容仅供学习参考,不准确地方联系删除处理!