Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma detected in hepatogastric ligament:A case repo

Wen-Xin Yan, You-Xi Yu, Ping Zhang, Xing-Kai Liu, Yan Li

Abstract The most common organ where follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) occurs is in cervical lymph nodes, while few cases are found in extranodal organs such as liver, spleen, and soft tissue. This is a case report that FDCS occurs in the hepatogastric ligament. To our knowledge, there is no such case that has been reported previously. A 47-year-old male patient was found to have an intraabdominal mass during an annual physical examination. Computed tomography showed a 4.2 cm × 4.1 cm mass located at the lesser curvature of the stomach, above the pancreas. During operation, a tumor mass was found in the hepatogastric ligament and a radical resection was performed. The tumor was diagnosed as FDCS by pathology and immunohistochemical testing. The patient had a favorable recovery, and no obvious abnormality was found 3 months postoperation.

Key words: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma; Hepatogastric ligament; Pathology;Immunohistochemistry; Computed tomography; Case report

INTRODUCTION

Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare malignant tumor derived from hyperplasia dendritic cells. FDCS cases were first reported and discussed by Mondaet al[1]in 1986. Unlike normal dendritic cells, follicular dendritic cells have no ability to present antigens[2]. FDCS, derived from hyperplastic dendritic cells, usually occurs in lymph nodes, especially in the cervical lymph node. Few cases occur in extranodal organs such as liver, spleen and soft tissue[3]. Most FDCS patients are young adults,with no notable gender differences[4]. Surgery is presently the main therapeutic strategy. Although more than 200 cases were found by searching PubMed databases from 1986 to present using “follicular dendritic cell sarcoma” as the key word, no cases were reported of FDCS in the hepatogastric ligament. To our knowledge, this is a very rare localization for FDCS and necessitates attention from clinicians regarding the possibility of an abdominal mass in FDCS patients.

CASE REPORT

A 47-year-old male patient was found to have an enterocoelic mass during an annual physical exam. There were no any gastrointestinal symptoms when the patient was admitted to our hospital. Relevant past medical history included a long period of outdoor work, irregular eating times, smoking and alcohol abuse over about thirty years. Computed tomography (CT) scans showed a 4.2 cm × 4.1 cm mass located at the lesser curvature of the stomach, above the pancreas (Figure 1). The clinical diagnosis was an abdominal occupying mass. During operation, the tumor mass was found to be located in the hepatogastric ligament next to the lesser curvature of the stomach and cardia. A radical resection was performed and tumor size was measured to be 4.5 cm × 5.5 cm × 3 cm, with the appearance of a smooth surface, brown coloration, abundant blood supply and firm texture (Figure 2).

The pathological reports included the following: (1) Marginal sinus, non-expanded vessels, vestigial lymphoid follicles and vestigial reticular cells, tumor tissues are surrounded by adipose tissue and incrassated fiber capsule; (2) The spindle or oval tumor cells are arranged in a whirlpool or woven pattern; (3) Cells show abundant cytoplasm but no clear boundary between cells; and (4) Other pathological features include nearly-circular cell nucleus, slender chromatin, and few mitoses (Figure 2).The immunohistochemical test results included the following: CD21(+), CD23(+),CD35(+), S-100(partial+), BC12(+), BC16(+), CDε(T+), CD5(+), CD20(B+),CD38(little+), CD43(T+), Cyclind1(+), Ki67(20%+), Mum(partial+), CD10(-), Pax5(-),EBER(-). The representative immunohistochemical tests with positive staining and negative staining are shown in Figure 3. In summary, the pathological diagnosis was FDCS. Post-operation, the patient had a favorable recovery without complications.After the operation, the patient had no obvious abnormalities at the follow-up consultations in the first month and third months.

DISCUSSION

FDCS is a low-moderate malignant tumor but with a higher rate of relapse and metastasis[5]. The carcinogenic mechanisms of FDCS initiation and progression are largely unknown. About 10-20% of patients usually suffer from hyaline-vascular Castleman disease (HVCD)[6]. Since FDCS with HVCD has increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), it is speculated that FDCS may be derived from hyperplastic dendritic cells stimulated by VEGF[7,8]. As a malignant tumor of the lymphatic system, no evidence shows that FDCS has any relationship with Epsteim-Barr virus and Epstein-Barr-encoded-RNA, which is typically used as a negative control for diagnosis[9].

Figure 1 Computed tomography scans of the tumor.

There are about 200 cases of FDCS reported after Monda[1]’s first report in 1986.There is an incidence of morbidity in young adults with a median age of 43-year-old,however there are no gender differences. FDCS is usually detected in lymph nodes,especially the cervical lymph node. FDCS is also found in other lymph nodes such as the mediastinum, retroperitoneum, mesentery, and tonsil[10]. FDCS may occur in extronodal glands, including the liver, stomach, spleen, pancreas, intestine, muscles,and skin. Since the clinical manifestation of FDCS has no specificity, it is difficult to find or make an accurate diagnosis based solely on a general clinical examination.FDCS occurring in the lymph gland is typically in chronic processing, with painless swollen lymph nodes. FDCS that occurs intraabdominally may easily metastasize to other organs, such as the liver and lung.

The diagnosis of FDCS is mainly based on microscopy-based observations of cytological features and immunohistochemical tests. In low-power fields, the cytological features are characterized by spindle to ovoid or fusiform cell forming fascicles, whorle, diffuse sheet or nodular shapes with lymphocyte infiltration[11,12]. In high-power fields, cytoplasm appears as thin eosinophilic. Tumor cells have symplasma with non-clear boundaries. Cell nuclei are circular or ovular with clear nuclear envelopes. The chromatin usually exhibits vacuolization or a stipping shape.Mitochondria are occasionally seen in the nucleus. A large area of coagulative necrosis is usually found in patients with poor prognoses[13].

FDCS in electron microscopy shows long villar cells linked together by desmosome junctions[12]. Immunohistochemical characteristics of FDCS are positive staining for CD21, CD23 and CD35, which are the main diagnostic markers to differentiate from other diseases, including dendritic sarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, lymphoma, and especially interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma (IDCS). There are other non-specific positive immunohistochemistry biomarkers including CD68, S-100, CD1a, D2-40 and Ki-67. Positive Ki-67 expression is also an important index of prognosis[11].

The potential misdiagnosis of FDCS includes histiocytic sarcoma (HS), Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS), and IDCS. The immunohistochemical biomarkers being used most often for these 4 diseases (FDCS, HS, LCS and IDCS) are CD68, CD1a, CD21, CD23,LYS and S-100. According to previous reports[13], the expression profile is the following: HS: CD68 (100%), CD1a (0%), CD21/CD35 (0%), LYS (94%), S100 (33%);LCS: CD68 (96%), CD1a (100%), CD21/CD35 (0%), LYS (42%), S100 (100%); IDCS:CD68 (50%), CD1a (0%), CD21/CD35 (0%), LYS (25%), S100 (100%); FDCS: CD68(54%), CD1a (0%), CD21/CD35 (100%), LYS (8%), S-100 (16%). In addition, the diagnosis of FDCS also needs to be distinguished from ectopic thymoma, malignant melanoma, lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Immunohistochemical tests of CD21, CD23 and CD35 are the most accurate indicators for distinguishing FDCS from non-FDCS diseases.

Currently, there is no valid therapeutic strategy for FDCS. The Cytoxan,Hydroxyrubicin, Oncovin and Prednisone (CHOP) program is generally used for malignant lymphoma or soft tissue sarcoma. Reports indicate that the CHOP program has no satisfactory effect, however doxorubicin (DXR), etoposide,methylprednisolone, cisplatin, and cytarabine (ESHAP) are recommended[2]. Due to lack of sufficient data for statistical analysis and effective follow-up work, there is no affirmative answer to the curative effects. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy may be appropriated to those patients who have no chance of receiving an operation.However, we cannot treat patients with standard radiotherapy or chemotherapy regimens because FDCS is not diagnosed before surgery. The first choice is therefore radical resection. For prognosis, it is known that age (＜ 40-years-old), large tumor size(＞ 6 cm), mitotic counts (＞ 5/10 high-power field), positive Ki-67, and large areas of coagulative necrosis are indicators of a poor prognosis[2]. In addition, intra-abdominal FDCS, metastasis and recurrence more commonly lead to a poor prognosis.

Figure 2 Gross anatomy of the spited tumor and its histology. A: Gross anatomy of tumor, spited specimens; B: Histology by H and E staining shows the mild shapes of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, comprised of fascicular oval and spindle cells, as well as infiltration of small lymphocytes into the tumor (200 ×magnification); C: The high power field of histology by H and E staining shows that cytoplasm is abundant and eosinophilic. The cell nuclei are small and clear with ovalular or long spindle shapes (400 × magnification).

Figure 3 Immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissues. Immunohistochemical images show positive staining for CD21, CD23 and CD35, which are specific biomarkers for diagnosing follicular dendritic cell sarcoma. Ki-67 staining shows 20% positive cells, while Epstein-Barr-encoded RNA was used as a negative stain.200 × magnification for all images.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Case characteristics

Without any obvious or special clinical symptoms, an enterocoelic mass is found by computed tomography (CT) scanning during an annual physical examination.

Clinical diagnosis

An enterocoelic mass is found by CT.

Differential diagnosis

Using different methods (location, imageology, histopathology) to distinguish it from other tumours.

Laboratory diagnosis

Diagnosis of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is mainly based on microscopical analysis of cytological features and immunohistochemistry.

Imaging diagnosis

CT can reveal occupying masses.

Pathological diagnosis

Immunohistochemical detection of CD21, CD23 and CD35 are the most accurate indicators that distinguish FDCS from non-FDCS diseases.

Treatment

Radical resection to remove the tumor.

Term explanation

FDCS: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma.

Experiences and lessons

FDCS is still an uncommon disease and it is therefore necessary to find more effective diagnostic indicators and better treatment strategies.